Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Ph.D. candidate in Knowledge and Information Science, science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Communication and Knowledge Sciences, Alameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Communication and Knowledge Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Professor, Department of Communication and Knowledge Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Purpose: This research aimed to identify and evaluate the risks of content production in the governmental digital libraries of Tehran.
Method: In terms of essence, this research is synthetic (library studies, qualitative and quantitative), and regarding purpose, it is an applied one. In the first part, using the studies of the research literature, a set of indicators related to the risks of content production in the governmental libraries of Tehran was obtained. The second part of this research involved a fuzzy Delphi approach that was conducted at two stages among 20 experts. In this stage, a researcher-made questionnaire based on the indicators obtained from the first stage was used. The third part of the research was a survey-analysis conducted with a quantitative method using a questionnaire made out based on the results of qualitative stage with three criteria: the probability of occurrence, effect intensity, and the inability of organization to respond and was distributed among 100 managers and experts of governmental digital libraries in Tehran.
Findings: In this research, the risks of content production were identified and fell into nine major categories (human force, environmental factors, infrastructure, protection and maintenance, creators` technical rights, integration, content evaluation of sources and authors and information security).
Conclusion: The results of this evaluation show that digital libraries are not exactly at their best level when it comes to their responses to the risk of human resources, authors' rights, and integration risks.
Keywords