Representation of the Information Ecosystem Centered on the Informational Energy of Iran's Publishing Industry Based on Grounded Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Information Science and Epistemology, Department of Communication Sciences and Epistemology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Communication Sciences and Epistemology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Iran’s publishing information ecosystem has become increasingly complex and unstable due to digital transformation, shifting audience behavior, and political and economic pressures. A major challenge is the absence of a comprehensive information system that limits effective decision-making. This study aims to represent the structure, interactions, and disruptions within this ecosystem, focusing on the flow of informational energy, using a grounded theory approach.
Method: A qualitative grounded theory approach was employed. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 key stakeholders, including publishers, government officials, booksellers, authors, and union representatives from Tehran and other regions. Thematic analysis was conducted through open, axial, and selective coding. Validity was ensured via participant review, constant data comparison, and theoretical saturation.
Findings: The central phenomenon is a disruption in the flow of informational energy, caused by the lack of a comprehensive information system, centralized policies, cultural censorship, and information monopolization. Contextual factors, including regional disparities, weak digital infrastructure, limited informational literacy, and opaque policymaking, exacerbate this disruption. Stakeholders predominantly adopt reactive strategies, relying on informal networks, withdrawing from formal processes, and producing content without market analysis, reflecting a fragmented and inefficient information environment.
Conclusion: Iran’s publishing information ecosystem lacks transparency, dynamism, and informational equity. To restore the flow of informational energy, the study recommends developing a comprehensive publishing information system, decentralizing information resources, enhancing publishers’ information literacy, and creating open data networks. These measures aim to support informed decision-making and foster cultural dynamism.

Keywords

References

Afzali, A., & Aboojafari, R. (2018). Economic challenges of publishing in Iran: Proposed indicators of economic statistics and innovation. Critical Research Journal of Texts and Humanities Programs, 18(2), 131–151.
Asgharnezhad, H., & Farajpahlu, A. (2018). The impact of new information technologies on the book publishing process: A phenomenological study. Librarianship and Information Science, 21(4), 91–123.
Azarang, A. (2018). Challenges of book publishing. Tehran: Khaneh Ketab.
Bab alhavaeji , F. (2002). Introduction to the basics of printing and publishing. Tehran: Takook Zarrin.
Bonina, C., Koskinen, K., Eaton, B., & Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 31(6), 869–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12326
Bozarth, C. B., & Handfield, R. B. (2016). Introduction to operations and supply chain management (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Devine-Wright, P. (Ed.). (2011). Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation. Routledge.
Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Energy citizenship: Psychological aspects of evolution in sustainable energy technologies. In G. Spaargaren, A. Loeber, & P. Oosterveer (Eds.), Governing technology for sustainability (pp. 63–86). Routledge.
Duff, W. M., & Chen, K. (2019). Toward a participatory information ecology: Conceptualizing collaboration in knowledge environments. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 850–869. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2018-0105
Duff, W. M., & Chen, X. (2019). Participatory knowledge ecosystems in information studies. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 766–785.
Ebrahimi, H., Bab-alhawaeji, F., Matlabi, D., & Hariri, N. (2024). Investigating the factors affecting professional book publishing and presenting a model in Iran. Public Library and Information Science Research, 30(4), Serial No. 119.
Elias, M., & Gonzalez, L. J. (2022). The evolution of library services in the digital era: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Digital Library Innovation, 18(1), 15–32.
Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press.
Hamann, R., et al. (2022). Abstract papers from the Energy Informatics Academy Conference 2022 (EI.A 2022). Energy Informatics, 5(Suppl 1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-022-00219-2
IFLA. (2021). Global vision: Ideas store and strategic directions. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. https://www.ifla.org
Kreutzmann-Gallasch, A., & Schroff, S. (2022). A case for openness – Book publishing and the role of Amazon. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 53(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01159-w
Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Understanding and communicating social informatics: A framework for studying and teaching the human contexts of information and communication technologies. Information Today.
Landon, P., & Garrod, C. (2005). Digital ecosystems: Towards an information ecology. Journal of Information Science, 31(2), 102–115.
McLellan, G. (2016). Information energy and knowledge ecosystems. Library Trends, 64(3), 501–517.
Mashayekhi, A. (2017). System dynamics: A systemic perspective. Tehran: Ariana Ghalam.
Parsons, C., & Hick, S. (2008). Moving from the digital divide to digital inclusion. Currents: Scholarship in the Human Services, 7(2), 1–15.
Ritchie, P. D. L., Alkhayuon, H., Cox, P. M., & Wieczorek, S. (2022). Rate-induced tipping in natural and human systems. Earth System Dynamics, 14, 669–683. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-669-2023
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., & Huntingdon, P. (2004). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want? Learned Publishing, 17(4), 261–273.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423; 27(4), 623–656.
Shamsuddoha , M., Khan, E. A., Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Nasir, T. (2025). Revolutionizing supply chains: Unleashing the power of AI-driven intelligent automation and real-time information flow. Information, 16(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010026
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE.
Torabi Al-Mouti, M., Matlabi, D., Bab-alhawaeji, F., & Hariri, N. (2021). A paradigmatic model of book distribution in Iran: Based on the grounded theory approach. Library and Information Science Studies, 13(2), 115–138.
UNESCO. (2022). Publishing and the digital environment: A new era for the book industry. UNESCO.
Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M.-C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 October 2025
  • Revise Date: 18 February 2026
  • Accept Date: 03 June 2026

Share

How to cite

Statistics