Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Information Management and Knowledge Organization, National Library and Archives of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to critically analyze the textbook "Management of Digital Libraries: A Practical Guide" written by Mitra Samiei (2023) from Chapar Publications and evaluate it based on the standards and criteria of university textbooks.
Method: This was an applied research study in terms of purpose and mixed-method in terms of approach, which used critical qualitative analysis and descriptive survey. A checklist was employed for qualitative evaluation of the content and formal structures of the textbook on a 5-point Likert scale.
Findings: According to the analysis results, the textbook scored 54/70 (72%) for formal criteria, which was acceptable. In contrast, it scored 40/70 (53.33%) and 47/70 (67.14%) for structural and writing criteria, respectively, which were unacceptable. It scored 66/95 (69.47%, almost 70%) for content criteria. In general, the textbook under criticism can be suitable and practical for students as a work that collects all the materials available in digital libraries by solving the stated problems.
Conclusion: Among the factors that can help improve the present work are modifying photo captions, the publisher's innovative cover design, footnotes for jargon, required persons and concepts, citations, glossary and index, and a list of tables and figures. Therefore, the author is recommended to provide practical examples and new instances, employ up-to-date sources, reduce textbook volume, and avoid duplicate content to improve the current work in the next editions. Also, among the strengths of this textbook is a separate chapter dedicated to digital librarianship, organizational structure, human resources in digital libraries, and the author's credibility and expertise.

Keywords

Alipour-Hafezi, M. (2019). Designing the Digital Library. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
Armand, M. (2020). A Review of Research and Writing Textbook. Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Sciences, 20 (20): 1-16. [In Persian].
Gharagozlu, H., Soleimani, N. and Armand, M. (2017). A critical review of mostly-used university textbooks in communication discipline based on standards of university textbooks. Proceedings of First National Conference on Reviewing Humanities Books and Texts (Vol. 2) [In Persian].
Gurung, Regan & Martin, Ryan. (2011). Predicting Textbook Reading: The Textbook Assessment and Usage Scale. Teaching of Psychology. 38. 22-28. 10.1177/0098628310390913. 
Hoseini, M.H. and Matoor, M. (2012). Criticism of Iranian educational sciences university textbooks. University Textbooks; Research and Writing, 26, 119-142 [In Persian].
Jamali-Zavare, B., Nasr, A.R., Nili, M.R., and Armand, M. (2009). Studying the psychological criteria of authoring university textbooks. University Textbooks; Research and Writing, 23, 19-35 [In Persian].
Mahmood, Kh. (2011). Standardization of textbook evaluation criteria through development of quality textbook indicators. https://piqc.edu.pk/casestudies/Dr_Khalid_Mahmood_Standardization_of_Textbook_Evaluation_Criteria_Through_Development_of_Quality_Textbook_Indicators_Education_Quality_Case_Study_PIQC.pdf
Mansooriyan, Y. (2013). One Hundred criteria of efficient university books. University Textbooks; Research and Writing, 17(29), 1-17. [In Persian]. 
Nili-Ahmadabadi, M. and Dana, A. (2017). A query on the components and aspects of critical assessment of academic textbooks with an emphasis on the principles of planning and organizing educational messages. Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences and Council for the Study of Humanities Texts and Books, 17(7), 219-233 [In Persian].
Norouzi, Y. (2016). Preservation in digital libraries. Quarterly book review of information and communication, 3 (10): 43-54. http://icbr.faslnameh.org/article-1-267-fa.html [In Persian]. 
Papi, Z. (2023). A Critical Review and Evaluation of the Textbook Entitled Designing the Digital Library Based on the Standards and Criteria of University Textbooks. International Journal of Digital Content Management, 4(6), 395-413. doi: 10.22054/dcm.2022.70058.1156
Radfar, H, Noori, S. (2015). Book Review of Digital Libraries: Information Exchange. Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Sciences, 15 (37): 47-67. [In Persian].  
Razi, A. (2009). The critical review criteria of university textbooks. SAMT Sayings, 21, 21-30 [In Persian].
Refahi-Kamsari, A, Asnafi, A.R. and Haji-Zeinolabedini, M. (2020). Content ranking of professional books in humanities from experts' views. Library and Information Quarterly, 25 (3): 143-165.
http://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_109874_87fecbee0fe7166f0ae3aa5146ec42ce.pdf [In Persian].
Samiei, M. (2023). Management of digital libraries: a practical guide. Tehran: Chapar [In Persian].
Shahlai, H., Safar-Navade, M. Armand, M. and Moosapoor, N. (2021). Identifying university textbook criteria for designing a scheme by a meta-synthesis qualitative. University Textbooks; Research and Writing, 25 (48), 88-118 [In Persian].
Zerehsaz, M. (2013). Digital libraries: user interface. Ketabe mah Kolyat, 190: 44-47. [In Persian].
Yar-Mohammadian, M.H., Armand, M. and Zare'i, H. (2009). Evaluating academic textbooks in Humanities based on academic textbooks appropriate criteria. University Textbooks Research and Writing, 14(23), 36-58 [In Persian].