<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Allameh Tabataba'i University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Digital Content Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3116-1715</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Critical Analysis and Evaluation of the Textbook &quot;Management of Digital Libraries: A Practical Guide&quot; Based on the Standards and Criteria of University Textbooks</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>129</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>145</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">18960</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22054/dcm.2025.77006.1226</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zeinab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Papi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Information Management and Knowledge Organization, National Library and Archives of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-1495-0723</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>02</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Purpose&lt;/strong&gt;: The purpose of this paper was to critically analyze the textbook &quot;Management of Digital Libraries: A Practical Guide&quot; written by Mitra Samiei (2023) from Chapar Publications and evaluate it based on the standards and criteria of university textbooks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;/strong&gt;: This was an applied research study in terms of purpose and mixed-method in terms of approach, which used critical qualitative analysis and descriptive survey. A checklist was employed for qualitative evaluation of the content and formal structures of the textbook on a 5-point Likert scale.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings&lt;/strong&gt;: According to the analysis results, the textbook scored 54/70 (72%) for formal criteria, which was acceptable. In contrast, it scored 40/70 (53.33%) and 47/70 (67.14%) for structural and writing criteria, respectively, which were unacceptable. It scored 66/95 (69.47%, almost 70%) for content criteria. In general, the textbook under criticism can be suitable and practical for students as a work that collects all the materials available in digital libraries by solving the stated problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;: Among the factors that can help improve the present work are modifying photo captions, the publisher&#039;s innovative cover design, footnotes for jargon, required persons and concepts, citations, glossary and index, and a list of tables and figures. Therefore, the author is recommended to provide practical examples and new instances, employ up-to-date sources, reduce textbook volume, and avoid duplicate content to improve the current work in the next editions. Also, among the strengths of this textbook is a separate chapter dedicated to digital librarianship, organizational structure, human resources in digital libraries, and the author&#039;s credibility and expertise.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Digital Libraries</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Critical analysis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">University textbook</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://dcm.atu.ac.ir/article_18960_db5868f688fa2aedf45453ed89299e8a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
